Results: Exact: 0. Elapsed time: ms. All rights reserved. History Favourites. Reverso for Windows It's free Download our free app. Join Reverso, it's free and fast! Register Login.
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Десятый арбитражный апелляционный суд подтвердил решение в пользу Swatch
In a decision of 23 May , the Federal Arbitrazh Court of the Moscow Circuit confirmed the position previously taken by the Tenth Arbitrazh Appellate Court and by the Court of the Region of Moscow in respect of the domain name swatch. According to the Federal Court, the registrant of swatch. Russian legislation allows owners of well known brands to protect their rights also in the Internet. More and more courts in the Russian Federation agree to this point of view. It is a policy of Swatch not to tolerate cybersquatting of its trademarks and to take legal action against all third parties that infringe Swatch trademarks by using them for domain registrations. Only few months after the first bio-sourced Swatch launched in September , here comes a new and unique mix of ceramic and bio-sourced plastic — made by Swatch. The watches will be available at Swatch stores worldwide and swatch. The assortment features six….
Tenth Arbitrazh Appellate Court confirms decision in favour of Swatch
Visit Us Contact Us. On February 28, , the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the Disputed Domain Name. On March 2, , the Registrar transmitted by email to the Center its verification response disclosing registrant and contact information for the Disputed Domain Name which differed from the named Respondent and contact information in the Complaint. The Center sent an email communication to the Complainant on March 5, , providing the registrant and contact information disclosed by the Registrar, and inviting the Complainant to submit an amendment to the Complaint. The Complainant filed an amended Complaint on March 9, On March 5, , the Center transmitted an email in English and Russian regarding the language of the proceeding to the parties. The Respondent did not comment on the language of the proceeding. In accordance with the Rules, paragraphs 2 and 4, the Center formally notified the Respondent of the Complaint in both Russian and English, and the proceedings commenced on March 23, In accordance with the Rules, paragraph 5, the due date for Response was April 12, The Response was filed with the Center on April 12,
Exhibit Petro Welt Technologies AG. PeWeTe Evolution Limited. Dated as of 21 July Table of Contents. Article I.